Activate Now
 
ProHealth me-cfs Vitamin and Natural Supplement Store and Health
Home  |  Log In  |  My Account  |  View Cart  View Your ProHealth Vitamin and Supplement Shopping Cart
800-366-6056  |  Contact Us  |  Help

Fibromyalgia  Chronic Fatigue Syndrome & M.E.  Natural Wellness  Supplement News  Forums  Our Story
Store     Brands   |   A-Z Index   |   Best Sellers   |   New Products   |   Deals & Specials   |   Under $10   |   SmartSavings Club

Trending News

There and Back Again – a CFS/Fibromyalgia Physician’s Recovery

Call to Action: Funding for ME/CFS Stricken From 2016 Federal Budget!

OMF's Severely Ill Patient Study Gets Large Donation

5 Health Strategies You Can Learn from Your Dog

Re-evaluating Your Habits

Increased Risk of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Following Atopy: A Population-Based Study

Weeding Out Your Negative Thoughts!

Clinically Studied Joint Relief Product for FM & ME/CFS

Restoring Cellular Energy Metabolism

D-Ribose: Energize Your Heart, Save Your Life

 
Print Page
Email Article

Case definitions and diagnostic criteria for myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue Syndrome: from clinical-consensus to evidence-based case definitions

  [ 2 votes ]   [ 3 Comments ]
By G. Morris G et al. • www.ProHealth.com • June 4, 2013


By G. Morris G et al.

Abstract

The symptom spectrum of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) was first detailed in 1959 and later operationalised into a diagnostic protocol (Melvin Ramsey). In 1988 the Holmes case definition coined the term chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Fukuda's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria are very heterogeneous and comprise patients with milder symptoms than the Holmes case definition.

The CDC Empirical Criteria for CFS lack sensitivity and/or specificity. Other CFS definitions, e.g. the Oxford criteria, delineate people with idiopathic fatigue. Some authors make the clinical CFS diagnosis when slightly increased self-rated fatigue scores are present. In 2011, Carruthers' International Consensus Criteria attempted to restore the focus on selecting people who suffer from ME.

Cognitive bias in criteria construction, patient selection, data collection and interpretation has led to the current state of epistemological chaos with ME, CFS, CFS/ME and ME/CFS, and CF being used interchangeably. Moreover, none of the above mentioned classifications meet statistically based criteria for validation. Diagnostic criteria should be based on statistical methods rather than consensus declarations. Ongoing discussions about which case definition to employ miss the point that the criteria did not pass appropriate external validation.

In 2012, Maes et al. performed pattern recognition methods and concluded that CFS patients (according to Fukuda's criteria) should be divided into those with CFS or ME, on the basis that people with ME display a worsening of their illness following increases in physical or cognitive activity.

Both ME and CFS are complex disorders that share neuro-immune disturbances, which are more severe in ME than in CFS. This paper expands on that strategy and details a range of objective tests, which confirm that a person with ME or CFS has a neuro-immune disease.

By means of pattern recognition methods future research should refine the Maes' case definitions for ME and CFS by including well-scaled symptoms, staging characteristics and neuro-immune biomarkers, including immune-inflammatory assays, bioenergetic markers and brain imaging.

Source: Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013 May 22;34(3):185-199. [Epub ahead of print]. Morris G, Maes M. Mumbles Head, Pembrey llanelli, UK. dr.michaelmaes@hotmail.com.




Please Discuss This Article:   Post a Comment 

?
Posted by: IanH
Jun 4, 2013
Who decided that ME is different from CFS???
Do we now have two diseases???
Reply Reply

 
Diagnostic criteria
Posted by: IanH
Jun 4, 2013
"Diagnostic criteria should be based on statistical methods rather than consensus declarations"

No they shouldn't. They should be based on biomarkers.

 

 
biomarkers
Posted by: IanH
Jun 4, 2013
When we have biomarkers or at least accept some of those we already have then we will be able to sort people on their severity against those biomarkers.. I am surprised that Michael Maes is suggesting this dichotomy, it is premature. We need more research into biomarkers AND more funding to clarify them.

 

 
Free Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia Newsletters
Subscribe to
Our FREE
Newsletter
Subscribe Now!
Receive up-to-date ME/CFS & Fibromyalgia treatment and research news
 Privacy Guaranteed  |  View Archives

Save on Nutritional Supplement Orders

Featured Products

MitoQ® MitoQ®
Powerful Antioxidant Support to Mitochondria
B-12 Extreme™ B-12 Extreme™
The Most Potent Vitamin B-12 on Earth
Energy NADH™ 12.5mg Energy NADH™ 12.5mg
Improve Energy & Cognitive Function
Hydroxocobalamin Extreme™ Hydroxocobalamin Extreme™
The B-12 your brain needs for detox & sharpness
Mitochondria Ignite™ with NT Factor® Mitochondria Ignite™ with NT Factor®
Reduce Fatigue up to 45%

Natural Remedies

Probiotic Mint Promotes Healthy Gums & Teeth, Freshens Breath and Whitens Teeth Probiotic Mint Promotes Healthy Gums & Teeth, Freshens Breath and Whitens Teeth
Sunshine Vitamin Has D-lightful Health Benefits Sunshine Vitamin Has D-lightful Health Benefits
The Big Blue Fish that Helps Chase the Blues Away The Big Blue Fish that Helps Chase the Blues Away
Eating Fat is Good… Maybe… Could Be… Sometimes Eating Fat is Good… Maybe… Could Be… Sometimes
Secret Nutrient for Radiant Skin Secret Nutrient for Radiant Skin

FIBROMYALGIA RESOURCES
What is Fibromyalgia?
Fibromyalgia Diagnosis
Fibromyalgia Symptoms
Fibromyalgia Treatments
| CFS RESOURCES
What is CFS?
ME/CFS Diagnosis
ME/CFS Symptoms
ME/CFS Treatments
| FORUMS
Fibromyalgia
ME/CFS
ADVANCED MEDICAL LABS
WHOLESALE  |  AFFILIATES
GUARANTEE  |  PRIVACY
CONTACT US
LIBRARY
RSS
SITE MAP
ProHealth on Facebook  ProHealth on Twitter  ProHealth on Pinterest  ProHealth on Google Plus
Credit Card Processing