Get FREE U.S. Shipping on $75 Orders*

Decreased electroporation efficiency in Borrelia burgdorferi containing linear plasmids lp25 and lp56: impact on transformation of infectious B. burgdorferi.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Abstract

The presence of the linear plasmids lp25 and lp56 of Borrelia burgdorferi B31 was found to dramatically decrease the rate of transformation by electroporation with the shuttle vector pBSV2, an autonomously replicating plasmid that confers kanamycin resistance (P. E. Stewart, R. Thalken, J. L. Bono, and P. Rosa, Mol. Microbiol. 39:714-721, 2001). B. burgdorferi B31 clones had transformation efficiencies that were either low, intermediate, or high, and this phenotype correlated with the presence or absence of lp25 and lp56. Under the conditions utilized in this study, no transformants were detected in clones that contained both lp25 and lp56; the few kanamycin-resistant colonies isolated did not contain pBSV2, indicating that the resistance was due to mutation. Intermediate electroporation rates (10 to 200 colonies per micro g of DNA) were obtained with B31 clones that were either lp25(-) and lp56(+) or lp25(+) and lp56(-). Clones in this group that initially contained lp25 lacked this plasmid in pBSV2 transformants, a finding consistent with selective transformation of lp25(-) variants. High transformation rates (>1,000 colonies per micro g of DNA) occurred in clones that lacked both lp25 and lp56. Sequence analysis indicated that lp25 and lp56 contain genes that may encode restriction and/or modification systems that could result in the low transformation rates obtained with strains containing these plasmids. The previously reported correlation between lp25 and infectivity in mice, coupled with the barrier lp25 presents to transformation, may explain the difficulty in obtaining virulent transformants of B. burgdorferi.

Infect Immun. 2002 Sep;70(9):4798-804. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t; Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.

ProHealth CBD Store

 

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...



Leave a Reply