10% Off $75 Orders! Use Code SAVE10P Shop Now
One use per customer. Not available with Autoship. Expires 5/28/18.

Estimated effects of projected climate change on the basic reproductive number of the Lyme disease vector Ixodes scapularis.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The extent to which climate change may affect human health by increasing risk from vector-borne diseases has been under considerable debate.

OBJECTIVES:

We quantified potential effects of future climate change on the basic reproduction number (R0) of the tick vector of
Lyme disease, Ixodes scapularis, and explored their importance for
Lyme disease risk, and for vector-borne diseases in general.

METHODS:

We applied observed temperature data for North America and projected temperatures using regional climate models to drive an I. scapularis population model to hindcast recent, and project future, effects of climate warming on R0. Modeled R0 increases were compared with R0 ranges for pathogens and parasites associated with variations in key ecological and epidemiological factors (obtained by literature review) to assess their epidemiological importance.

RESULTS:

R0 for I. scapularis in North America increased during the years 1971-2010 in spatio-temporal patterns consistent with observations. Increased temperatures due to projected climate change increased R0 by factors (2-5 times in Canada and 1.5-2 times in the United States), comparable to observed ranges of R0 for pathogens and parasites due to variations in strains, geographic locations, epidemics, host and vector densities, and control efforts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Climate warming may have co-driven the emergence of
Lyme disease in northeastern North America, and in the future may drive substantial
disease spread into new geographic regions and increase tick-borne
disease risk where climate is currently suitable. Our findings highlight the potential for climate change to have profound effects on vectors and vector-borne diseases, and the need to refocus efforts to understand these effects.

Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jun;122(6):631-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307799. Epub 2014 Mar 10. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...



Leave a Reply