Get FREE U.S. Shipping on $75 Orders*

Lyme disease surveillance in Maryland, 1992.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Abstract

The incidence of
Lyme disease (LD) reported to the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene during 1992 was 6.5/100,000 population, ranging from 29.3 cases/100,000 on the Eastern Shore (74.4% of all cases) to no cases in the mountains of western Maryland. Among the 317 reported patients, 44.4% gave a history of tick exposure and 78.9% had positive serologic test results. For the 187 (59.0%) patients meeting the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveillance case definition, erythema migrans (EM) occurred in 69.5%, with arthritic (26.7%), neurologic (13.4%), and cardiac (2.1%) manifestations being less frequent. Patients not meeting the surveillance case definition were significantly more likely to have influenza-like symptoms, a smaller rash, and arthralgia. Patients meeting the CDC criteria were more likely to have an onset during the major transmission season in the summer (odds ratio (OR): 2.1; confidence interval (CI): 1.2 to 3.6) since this was the time when most (115/130) patients with EM were detected. Positive serologic results were more likely (OR: 2.2; CI: 1.2 to 4.2) in those not meeting the case definition. The treatment given to patients thought to have LD was almost always that recommended in the literature and there was no difference between treatment prescribed for patients meeting and those not meeting the case definition. These data show that physicians in Maryland are treating many patients for LD who are clinically diagnosed as having LD (e.g., febrile patients with flulike symptoms, patients with arthralgias or erythematous rashes < 5 cm in size) and who have positive serologic test results but who do not meet the CDC surveillance case definition. These patients and the large number of unreported patients being seen and treated for LD or tick bites must be added to the overall burden of LD in the state.

Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;6(1):24-9. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t; Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.

ProHealth CBD Store

 

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...



Leave a Reply