By David Tuller
Subscribe to the World's Most Popular Newsletter (it's free!)
In their response to Geraghty, the PACE investigators state that they have “repeatedly addressed” the various methodological concerns raised about the trial. While this is true, these responses have repeatedly failed to provide satisfactory explanations for the trial’s very serious flaws. This commentary examines how the current response once again demonstrates the ways in which the investigators avoid acknowledging the obvious problems with PACE and offer non-answers instead-arguments that fall apart quickly under scrutiny.
Source: Tuller D. Once again, the PACE authors respond to concerns with empty answers. J Health Psychol . 2017 Aug;22(9):1118-1122. doi: 10.1177/1359105317703788. Epub 2017 Apr 27.