FREE U.S. Shipping on $75+ Orders

Once again, the PACE authors respond to concerns with empty answers

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
Note: You can read the full article here.

By David Tuller

Abstract
 

In their response to Geraghty, the PACE investigators state that they have “repeatedly addressed” the various methodological concerns raised about the trial. While this is true, these responses have repeatedly failed to provide satisfactory explanations for the trial’s very serious flaws. This commentary examines how the current response once again demonstrates the ways in which the investigators avoid acknowledging the obvious problems with PACE and offer non-answers instead—arguments that fall apart quickly under scrutiny.

Source: David Tuller, Once again, the PACE authors respond to concerns with empty answers. Journal of Health Psychology. First Published April 27, 2017.

ProHealth CBD Store

 

Are you vitamin d deficient?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...



Leave a Reply