The Economic Impact of ME/CFS – Source: Dynamic Medicine, Apr 2008

[Note: To view the full text of this free access article, click here.]

Background: ME/CFS is characterized by debilitating fatigue in addition to other physical and cognitive symptoms. It is estimated to affect over 800,000 adults in the U.S.

ME/CFS often results in diminished functionality and increased economic impact. The economic impact of an illness is generally divided into two categories: direct and indirect costs.

Despite high prevalence rates and the disabling nature of the illness, few studies have examined the costs of ME/CFS at the individual and societal level. In fact, of the four studies examining the economic impact of ME/ME/CFS only two used a U. S. sample. The current study used community and tertiary samples to examine the direct costs of ME/CFS.

Methods: Using archival data, Study 1 examined the direct cost of ME/CFS in a community-based sample in Chicago. Study 2 estimated the direct cost of ME/CFS in a tertiary sample in Chicago. Both Study 1 and Study 2 assessed direct costs using office visit costs, medical test costs, and medication costs.

Results: For Study 1, the annual direct total cost per ME/CFS patient was estimated to be $2,342, with the total annual direct cost of ME/CFS to society being approximately $2 billion. In Study 2, the annual direct was estimated to be $8,675 per ME/CFS patient, with the total annual direct cost of ME/CFS to society being approximately $7 billion.

Conclusions: Using ME/CFS prevalence data of 0.42 and indirect costs estimates from Reynolds et al., 2004, the direct and indirect cost of ME/CFS to society was estimated to be $18,677,912,000 for the community sample and $23,972,300,000 for the tertiary sample. These findings indicate that whether or not individuals are recruited from a community or tertiary sample, ME/CFS imposes substantial economic costs.

Source: Dynamic Medicine. April 2008;7(1):6. PMID: 18397528, by Jason LA, Benton MC, Valentine L, Johnson A, Torres-Harding S. Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago; Departments of Psychology at Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas; University of North Texas, Denton; Roosevelt University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. [E-mail:]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (42 votes, average: 3.05 out of 5)

Leave a Reply