[The significance of chronic prostatitis for the etiopathology of prostate cancer.] Article in German – Source: Der Urologe, Apr 3, 2010

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (28 votes, average: 2.95 out of 5)

Although prostate cancer is of crucial impact as a common disease of men, numerous relationships remain unknown, particularly concerning its pathogenesis. A novel approach regarding the origin and development of prostate cancer is a phenomenon that has already been investigated in other human cancers: cancerogenesis due to chronic inflammation.

Hence, the present review introduces the current state of research concerning the relationship between chronic prostatitis and prostate cancer.

In addition to histological and biochemical features, the latest discoveries are discussed, including the relationship between the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and infection by the novel gammaretrovirus XMRV, similar to cervical cancer associated with HPV.

Source: Der Urologe, Apr 3, 2010. PMID: 20361321 by Wittschieber D, Schenkenberg S, Dietel M, Erbersdobler A. Institut für Pathologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland, [Email: daniel.wittschieber@charite.de]

Related articles

Phylogenetic analysis of murine leukemia virus sequences from longitudinally sampled chronic fatigue syndrome patients suggests PCR contamination rather than viral evolution.
Proteins of the XMRV retrovirus implicated in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and prostate cancer are homologous to human proteins relevant to both diseases – Source: NaturePrecedings, Jul 15, 2010
A 22-year prospective study of fish intake in relation to prostate cancer incidence and mortality – Source: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Nov 2008
Raltegravir Is a Potent Inhibitor of XMRV, a Virus Implicated in Prostate Cancer and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome – Source: PloS One, Apr 1, 2010
Analysis of XMRV integration sites from human prostate cancer tissues suggests PCR contamination rather than genuine human infection.
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (28 votes, average: 2.95 out of 5)

Leave a Reply