fbpx
Free U.S. Shipping on $75 Orders*

What name would YOU choose for CFS? Take the poll!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (29) votes, average: 4.50 out of 5
Loading...

By Erica Verrillo

In September 2013, the IOM was contracted by HHS to devise a new definition for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), the current CDC definition being considered too broad. It was also charged with providing a new name at its discretion. The IOM made its recommendations on Tuesday, February 10, 2015 in a report entitled, “Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness.” One of the recommendations of the report was to eliminate CFS and to replace it, as well as myalgic encephalomyelitis, with “systemic exertion intolerance disease” (SEID).

The IOM’s report on ME/CFS has generated a tremendous amount of media coverage (TimeCBSNY Times BlogABC), as well as considerable discussion in the ME/CFS community. While many have welcomed the report’s emphasis on the serious nature of the disease, there have been some lingering doubts about the appropriateness of the new name.

(You can read and/or download the report as well as watch the video of the announcement HERE.)

A Brief History of the Name “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”

In 1984, a mysterious illness struck residents of Incline Village, Nevada. At the time it was thought to be caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the herpesvirus that causes mononucleosis. For several years the disease was referred to as chronic EBV (CEBV). When EBV was disputed as the cause, Steven Straus of the NIH dubbed it “chronic fatigue syndrome” after its main presenting symptom. Straus was apparently unaware when he coined the term in 1988 that the disease already had a name that had been in use in the UK and Europe since 1959, “myalgic encephalomyelitis” (ME).

An outbreak of an illness identical to the one in Incline Village had struck the Royal Free Hospital in 1955. The attending physician of that outbreak was Dr. Melvin Ramsay, a doctor who not only documented the outbreak, but treated those who suffered from the disease for decades. The term he used for the disease was “myalgic encephalomyelitis,” in order to distinguish it from polioencephalomyelitis, the epidemic which had preceded the Royal Free outbreak.

Medical Impact of a Name

Virtually from the moment of its creation, patients, as well as specialists, voiced reservations about the name “chronic fatigue syndrome.” Not only did the name trivialize an illness that could be devastating for patients, but it departed from medical tradition.

Illnesses are not named after a single non-specific (common to many ailments) symptom. Critics pointed out that there is no “chronic coughing disease” (pneumonia), or “chronic forgetfulness disease” (Alzheimer’s). In addition to these drawbacks, the focus on fatigue drew attention away from one of the cardinal symptoms of the illness, post-exertional malaise (PEM). It also led to confusion and ultimately to the misdiagnosis of patients who had other conditions that present with chronic fatigue, such as MS and leukemia.

Public Reaction to SEID

While the ME/CFS community has universally welcomed the abandonment of CFS as a name for the disease, there have been mixed reactions to the IOM’s proposed new name, “systemic exertion intolerance disease” (SEID).

Those who like the new name have offered that “systemic” captures the fact that the disease affects multiple systems, and “exertion intolerance,” or PEM, is one of the cardinal symptoms of the disease. The fact that the IOM has defined the illness as a disease is especially important.

Those who are critical of SEID have pointed out that every disease affects multiple systems, therefore the inclusion of “systemic” is meaningless.  (The IOM’s previous renaming of Gulf War Illness as “chronic multi-symptom illness” was criticized for similar reasons.) They have also pointed out that “exertion intolerance” is non-specific. “Exercise intolerance” – as exertion intolerance is better known in the medical world – is a feature of cardiopulmonary diseases, hypothyroidism, cancer, and many other conditions. To make matters worse, “intolerance” can be easily interpreted by physicians as “aversion,” which increases the likelihood that patients will be referred to therapists and told to exercise.

Other Name Choices

The recommendations of the IOM are not public policy. No federal agency or department is obliged to follow them. In the past, the IOM has even retracted some of its recommendations. (After outcry from Gulf War veterans, “chronic multi-symptom illness” was rescinded by the IOM and replaced with Gulf War Illness.)

Some of the alternatives to both CFS and SEID that have been suggested are:

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: This is the long-standing name for the disease. Cons: 1) CNS inflammation has not been definitively proven. 2) Not all patients experience pain. Pros: 1) The fact that inflammation of the CNS has not been definitively proven does not prevent adopting this name for historical continuity, much like the names malaria (which means “bad air”) and cancer (from karkinos, which means “crab” in Greek). 2) The IOM recognized that pain was a definitive symptom of the disease, and that it was experienced in various forms by 94% of patients. 3) Myalgic encephalomyelitis, as opposed to either “chronic fatigue” or “systemic exertion intolerance,” sounds like a serious medical illness.

Ramsay’s Disease: Honors Dr. Melvin Ramsay. Cons: 1) There already is a Hunt Ramsay Syndrome. 2) The WHO discourages naming illnesses after people. Pros: 1) There is a longstanding medical tradition of honoring physicians who first describe an illness. 2) Ramsay’s Disease makes no claim about the etiology of the disease, which has yet to be determined.

Nightingale’s Disease: Honors Florence Nightingale, the founder of the Red Cross, and sufferer of a chronic ailment similar to ME. Cons: 1) Florence Nightingale probably did not have ME, but a chronic bacterial infection. Pros: 1) Florence Nightingale is famous. 2) This name skirts the issue of brain inflammation.

Cheney Peterson Disease: The two American physicians who attended the Incline Village outbreak. Cons: Neither physician has wanted this disease to be named after them. Pros: This name skirts the issue of brain inflammation.

Incline Village Disease: Where the illness was formally identified in the US. Cons: 1) The outbreak in Incline Village was preceded by outbreaks in Los Angeles, London, Iceland, and various other locales, many of which had names associated with them. There does not seem to be a clear point of origin. 2) The state of Nevada would not welcome one of their tourist attractions being associated with a disease. Pros: This name skirts the issue of brain inflammation.

Why Your Opinion Matters

Dr. Leonard Jason has stressed that input from the community on what to name this illness is crucial. As he has pointed out, names can stigmatize. And now that we have been provided with this opportunity by the IOM report, we should work together to devise a name that is appropriate.

Whether it is your disease, or someone you know suffers from it, or this is simply a matter of concern to you, ProHealth would like your input on this important matter.

Please take our short poll (only three questions!) on the name change HERE.

Join the name change discussion on ProHealth’s Forums.

share your comments

Enrich and inform our Community. Your opinion matters!

3 thoughts on “What name would YOU choose for CFS? Take the poll!”

  1. GWIveteran says:

    Thank you for this article.

    As a point of correction, the it was the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) that sought to change the name to the catch-all, “Chronic Multisymptom Illness” (CMI), essentially a reversion to VA’s traditional position that Gulf War Illness is, “the same as after every war,” and there was nothing special about this cohort — despite the fact that between one-fourth and one-third of the 697,000 veterans of the 1991 Gulf War have been shown in study after study to be suffering from GWI.

    It was the IOM that recommended VA revert to using the term, “Gulf War Illness” — in essence, doing Gulf War veterans a big favor. The recommendation was one of three major recommendations in, “Chronic Multisymptom Illness in Gulf War Veterans: Case Definitions Reexamined”, a 2014 report by IOM under contract with the VA for the IOM, “Committee on the Development of a Consensus Case Definition for Chronic Multisymptom Illness in 1990-1991 Gulf War Veterans”, IOM Board on the Health of Select Populations, Institute of Medicine.

    However, in the IOM’s newest Gulf War and Health literature review update (Gulf War & Health: Vol. 10), the IOM contradicts its own advice and has reverted to using “CMI” instead of “GWI”. However, the final report is still a year out, so it remains to be seen whether they heed the advice given to them by Gulf War veterans and Gulf War Illness researchers during their initial public sessions in December 2014 and January 2015.

  2. ericaverrillo says:

    I stand partially corrected. It was not the IOM that came up with “chronic multisymptom illness.” Nor was it the VA. It was the CDC.

    Keiji Fukuda, the man who devised the CDC’s case definition for CFS, created CMI in a study entitled, “Chronic multisymptom illness affecting Air Force veterans of the Gulf War.”

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9749480

  3. cngwaters@gmail.com says:

    I believe a name change is a waste of time and funding. This I must point out is directly an about face for me. After some thought I realized that a new name alone would just be silly and is really skirting the much more real issues of medical, scientific legal and govermental support that MS as an example has . After many years of being considered hysterical [mostly women] it was the medical community who had to swallow their collective and disrespectful “opinions” and admit MS was indeed real. What we we really need is the afore mentioned support not some name change that may infact have some people giving us futher critisim for trying to confuse the issue. After all “A rose by any other name is still in fact still a rose”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ProHealth CBD Store

 

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (29) votes, average: 4.50 out of 5
Loading...