ProHealth health Vitamin and Natural Supplement Store and Health
Home  |  Log In  |  My Account  |  View Cart  View Your ProHealth Vitamin and Supplement Shopping Cart
800-366-6056  |  Contact Us  |  Help
Facebook Google Plus
Fibromyalgia  Chronic Fatigue Syndrome & M.E.  Lyme Disease  Natural Wellness  Supplement News  Forums  Our Story
Store     Brands   |   A-Z Index   |   Best Sellers   |   New Products   |   Deals & Specials   |   Under $10   |   SmartSavings Club

Trending News

15 Health Benefits of Chia Seeds, According to Science

Tangerine Oil: A Citrusy Essential Oil With Well-Rounded Uses

Magnesium Deficiency Raises Your Risk of Many Chronic Ailments

Resveratrol supplementation improves arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetics

CoQ10's Potential Capabilities for Your Health

Testosterone replacement therapy associated with improved urinary, sexual function

How Can Melatonin Benefit You?

Cloves: Boost Your Immune System the Sweet and Spicy Way

The Many Potential Health Benefits of Curcumin

8 Chia Seed Recipes

Print Page
Email Article

New Medical Privacy Rules - Will Patients Be Exposed?

  [ 63 votes ]   [ Discuss This Article ] • August 16, 2002

From the 8-15-2002 Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report:

1. Providers, Rights Advocates Weigh In On Possible Effects of New Medical Privacy Rules

Access this story and related links online:

Although privacy advocates "hit the roof" after the Bush administration announced medical privacy regulations that are less restrictive than standards first proposed by the Clinton administration, hospitals and health care providers "applaud[ed]" the rules, which became official on Aug. 14, saying they "will maintain patients' privacy and could lead to better health care," the San Francisco Chronicle reports (Colliver, San Francisco Chronicle, 8/15).

The rules, which take effect next spring and apply to all electronic records but not those kept on paper, permit personal medical files to be shared only for purposes of treating patients, paying bills and carrying out various health care operations. The regulations say that only the smallest amount of information should be disclosed for specific purposes and that patients' names should be left out whenever possible. According to the guidelines, providers must receive patients' approval before revealing private information in "nonroutine" cases. However, unlike the Clinton administration proposal, providers can disclose medical records without patients' written permission (Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, 8/12).

Many hospitals and providers say the rules "offe[r] a balanced approach to privacy," the Chronicle reports. Michael Evans, senior vice president and chief risk officer at California-based Sutter Health, said, "We're all in favor of privacy, but there comes a point in time where you're so private you can't do anything." Craig Lanway, chief information officer for Hill Physicians Medical Group in California, added, "The way [the regulations] have been watered down, so to speak, will make the implementation easier from the provider perspective."

Confusion Ahead?

Several aspects of the rules, however, cause concern for consumers' rights advocates, the Chronicle reports. Insurance companies could have greater access to medical records, and the regulations, while prohibiting pharmacies from selling patient information to drug companies, could allow drug makers to pay pharmacies to promote certain treatments. In addition, certain language included in the guidelines is vague. "There's going to be a lot of confusion going forward. We're going to have to see how the courts and HHS wind up interpreting these things in the future," Kazuhiko Sano, an attorney at JK Health Information Privacy Advisors in San Francisco, said (San Francisco Chronicle, 8/15).

Still, while "patients aren't likely to notice many changes" under the new rules, it will be harder for third parties to obtain information about a patients' condition, the Colorado Springs Gazette reports (Radford, Colorado Springs Gazette, 8/15). And although the regulations are expected to save $30 billion in health care expenses over the next 10 years, implementing the guidelines will create "some degree of hassle" (Webster, Detroit News, 8/15). The rules, which give patients the right to view and make corrections to the records, will likely have a large impact on operational procedures, the Chronicle reports. "It's going to be an administrative nightmare," Evans said, adding, "You're talking about a tracking system that no one has had before" (San Francisco Chronicle, 8/15).


The following are summaries of several editorials on the new privacy regulations:

*Albany Times Union: The new rules have "further eroded" patients' medical privacy rights, and the guidelines could have unintended negative consequences, the Albany Times Union states in an editorial. For example, patients might stop sharing some health information with providers, or doctors might stop recording "embarrassing" information about their patients because of fears that it would be disclosed to third parties.

While the new rules should be commended for establishing "welcome restrictions" on using patient information to market drugs, the editorial concludes that the regulations "hardly answe[r] the question of why the White House had to give with one hand and take away with the other," the editorial concludes (Albany Times Union, 8/13).

*Contra Costa Times: The new privacy rules contain "shortcoming[s] that nee[d] to be corrected" before the guidelines go into effect, a Contra Costa Times editorial states. Any regulations that allow providers to share medical records with insurance companies are inadequate, the Times writes, and the White House should instead adopt the provisions included in the Clinton administration guidelines. The Times "fail[s] to see the health care purpose of allowing doctors and hospitals to divulge individual medical information to insurance firms" and concludes that the rules should "give a higher priority to individual privacy than to the profits" of health plans (Contra Costa Times, 8/15).

*Los Angeles Times: In general, the new privacy rules are "reasonable" and provide patients with "mild protections [that] are an improvement over the current anything-goes system," a Los Angeles Times editorial states. But several "tweaks" made by HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson to the original Clinton administration rules -- such as allowing "health care operators" access to medical records -- "leave patients needlessly vulnerable."

Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), who are preparing legislation on the issue, should "let most of Thompson's changes stand" but should "yield no ground on one principle: Barring medical emergencies, patients should be asked before their health records are disclosed." The Times concludes that legislators and officials should "be able to find a way to preserve medical efficiency without declaring open season on health privacy" (Los Angeles Times, 8/15).

Post a Comment

Featured Products From the ProHealth Store
Ultra EPA  - Fish Oil Ultra ATP+, Double Strength Optimized Curcumin Longvida®

Article Comments

Be the first to comment on this article!

Post a Comment

Optimized Curcumin Longvida with Omega-3

Featured Products

Optimized Curcumin Longvida® Optimized Curcumin Longvida®
Supports Cognition, Memory & Overall Health
FibroSleep™ FibroSleep™
The All-in-One Natural Sleep Aid
Energy NADH™ 12.5mg Energy NADH™ 12.5mg
Improve Energy & Cognitive Function
Ultra EPA  - Fish Oil Ultra EPA - Fish Oil
Ultra concentrated source of essential fish oils
Mitochondria Ignite™ with NT Factor® Mitochondria Ignite™ with NT Factor®
Reduce Fatigue up to 45%

Natural Remedies

Front Line Defense Against Colds & Flu - Support for Healthy Immune System Balance Front Line Defense Against Colds & Flu - Support for Healthy Immune System Balance
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sleep But Were Too Tired to Ask Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sleep But Were Too Tired to Ask
Curcumin - a Golden Gift of Nature with Benefits Still Untold Curcumin - a Golden Gift of Nature with Benefits Still Untold
Bone Broth Benefits for Digestion, Arthritis and Cellulite Bone Broth Benefits for Digestion, Arthritis and Cellulite
Running on Empty? Fuel Up with NADH Running on Empty? Fuel Up with NADH

ProHealth, Inc.
555 Maple Ave
Carpinteria, CA 93013
(800) 366-6056  |  Email

· Become a Wholesaler
· Vendor Inquiries
· Affiliate Program
Credit Card Processing
Get the latest news about Fibromyalgia, M.E/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Lyme Disease and Natural Wellness

CONNECT WITH US ProHealth on Facebook  ProHealth on Twitter  ProHealth on Pinterest  ProHealth on Google Plus

© 2017 ProHealth, Inc. All rights reserved. Pain Tracker App  |  Store  |  Customer Service  |  Guarantee  |  Privacy  |  Contact Us  |  Library  |  RSS  |  Site Map