Abstract: Chronic fatigue syndrome

Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):346-55.

Prins JB, van der Meer JW, Bleijenberg G.

Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. j.prins@mps.umcn.nl

During the past two decades, there has been heated debate about chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) among researchers, practitioners, and patients. Few illnesses have been discussed so extensively. The existence of the disorder has been questioned, its underlying pathophysiology debated, and an effective treatment opposed; patients’ organisations have participated in scientific discussions.

In this review, we look back on several controversies over CFS with respect to its definition, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. We review issues of epidemiology and clinical manifestations, focusing on the scientific status of CFS. Modern neuroscience and genetics research offer interesting findings for new hypotheses on the aetiology and pathogenesis of the illness.

We also discuss promising future issues, such as psychopathophysiology and mechanisms of improvement, and suggest multidisciplinary prospective studies of CFS and fatigue in the general population. These studies should pay particular attention to similarities to and differences from functional somatic syndromes and other fatiguing conditions.

PMID: 16443043 [PubMed – in process]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (182 votes, average: 3.05 out of 5)
Loading...



Leave a Reply